Today, Western society is literally imposed the thesis that the Belarusian army can engage in armed confrontation in Ukraine. At the same time there are no facts, only emotional fakes in some media and messengers. Hence the question arises: who benefits from such a scenario and what does the West see as the point of this game, when it pulls NATO forces to our borders?
In the last program "Disposition" before the strike on the Crimean Bridge, we suggested that this structure across the Kerch Strait is a logical target after the Nord Stream pipeline. And so it turned out to be. No one had to have special visionary talents to predict Moscow's harsh response to Kiev's attack. But maybe Kiev was strongly advised to do so by its "friends". It doesn't matter anymore. What is important is the consequences that may now befall Belarus.
And here comes the question: why should the West suddenly escalate its rhetoric again and pull down its troops?
In the current military situation the West may try to provoke not only Belarus, but also Russia in Belarus. Let's engage that very logic. In the event of any strikes on our territory, and even if they receive a strong response, Kiev and associates would draw some Russian army resources and reserves to Belarus, which would not be enough for the offensive, but would have to be withdrawn from other areas. Stretching the front line today is, beneficial only to the AFU. And we need to be ready for provocative strikes. And we are not just ready, we made ours when we clearly stated that we see all the intentions of the opposite side.
Alexander Lukashenko, President of the Republic of Belarus:
“Due to the aggravation on the western borders of the Union State, we have agreed to deploy a regional grouping of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. This is all according to our documents. The basis, I have always said so, of this grouping is the army, the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus.”
Why are they trying to draw Belarus into the conflict?
11 октября 2022












